개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Tsuda Shoukichi’s studies on Japanese history has been called“ Tsuda history,” “Tsuda’s history of thought,” taking the leading figure in studying Japanese history. His academic work covered various fields of historical studies such as historiographical study, critical study of Japanese classics, historical study of Japanese national thought, study of the history of ancient Chinese thought, etc.. This study examines his critical studies on Japanese classics and the problems of perception in Koran-Japan relationship and of distorted view about ancient Korean history, which resulted from Tsuda’s study.
The characteristic of “Tsuda history” was in his poignant criticism on the prevalent method of historical studies focusing on folklore and social development. His studies on comparative started from thorough critical investigations of Kojiki (古事記) and Nihon Shoki (日本書紀). He drew his picture of East Asia based on the uni-race theory, and it seems that he had an ideal of the peaceful uni-racial nation without power authorities.
His thought has been molded by the atmosphere of the times, i.e. the war between Russia and Japan in 1905 and the Japanese colonization of Korea in 1910. Through the analysis of mythologies in Kojiki and Nihon Shoki, Tsuda refused the theories that Japan and Korea had a common ancestor and that the Japanese emperor came from Korean blood. With these refusals, he offered the basis of studies on ancient Japanese history after the World War II, and it was his theory of the uni-race by which he refuted another theory that the ancient Japanese arrived from Korean peninsula. Tsuda’s uni-racial nation theory, however, bore a seed that could grow into the exclusive historical view centering on Japan.
Thus, before mentioning Tsuda’s historical positivism, it was a natural progress for completing the uni-racial nation theory that he tried to criticize the mythologies in Kojiki and Nihon Shoki, and to draw a distorted interpretation about ancient Korean history. His negation of early historical records in Samguk Sagi (三國史記) and his extensive distortion about ancient histories may not be free from the blame of colonialistic interpretation of history.
The characteristic of “Tsuda history” was in his poignant criticism on the prevalent method of historical studies focusing on folklore and social development. His studies on comparative started from thorough critical investigations of Kojiki (古事記) and Nihon Shoki (日本書紀). He drew his picture of East Asia based on the uni-race theory, and it seems that he had an ideal of the peaceful uni-racial nation without power authorities.
His thought has been molded by the atmosphere of the times, i.e. the war between Russia and Japan in 1905 and the Japanese colonization of Korea in 1910. Through the analysis of mythologies in Kojiki and Nihon Shoki, Tsuda refused the theories that Japan and Korea had a common ancestor and that the Japanese emperor came from Korean blood. With these refusals, he offered the basis of studies on ancient Japanese history after the World War II, and it was his theory of the uni-race by which he refuted another theory that the ancient Japanese arrived from Korean peninsula. Tsuda’s uni-racial nation theory, however, bore a seed that could grow into the exclusive historical view centering on Japan.
Thus, before mentioning Tsuda’s historical positivism, it was a natural progress for completing the uni-racial nation theory that he tried to criticize the mythologies in Kojiki and Nihon Shoki, and to draw a distorted interpretation about ancient Korean history. His negation of early historical records in Samguk Sagi (三國史記) and his extensive distortion about ancient histories may not be free from the blame of colonialistic interpretation of history.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 쓰다의 생애와 학문적 경향
Ⅲ.『 고사기』·『일본서기』비판을통한일본神代史연구
Ⅳ. 混合民族說에 대한 單一民族說의 주창
Ⅴ. 한·일 민족의 계통 부정과 한국 고대사 인식
Ⅵ. 맺음말
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (52)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
쓰다 소키치(津田左右吉)의 ‘중국’ 도가 연구와 아시아 멸시관
율곡학연구
2019 .01
-
上代神名의 二合漢字
일본연구
2013 .08
-
別個の古代史『三国史記』と『三国遺事』 : 『古事記』ㆍ『日本書紀』との対照から
일본문화학보
2015 .08
-
『三國史記』의 異體字 硏究
중국어문학논집
1996 .08
-
日本國定歷史敎科書로 보는 ‘民族主義’ - 고대편을 중심으로 -
日本思想
2008 .01
-
歷史理論
역사학보
1989 .12
-
『三國史記』의 加耶와 『日本書紀』의 任那·加羅기사에 대하여
민족문화
1999 .12
-
한국 고대사의 계보학
한국고대사연구
2008 .12
-
津田左右吉의 망령이 만들어낸 민족
신라사학보
2009 .12
-
『古事記』에 나타난 兄弟像에 관한 一考
日本學硏究
2016 .01
-
金富軾과 《三國史記》
한국사연구
1991 .06
-
羅 · 濟경계고(津田左右吉)
신라사학보
2009 .08
-
한민족의 정체성과 통일인문학의 고대 역사 서술에 대하여
통일인문학
2009 .05
-
『古事記』에 있어서「死」의 漢字表記 : 『古事記』에 있어서「死」의 漢字表記 :『三國史記』·『三國遺事』와의 比較
일본문화학보
2004 .02
-
『古事記』에 보이는 希望表現에 관한 고찰 : 『日本書紀』의 동일기사와의 대조를 통하여
일어일문학
2015 .02
-
근대 일본의 한국사관과 역사왜곡
한국독립운동사연구
2010 .04
-
日本 歷史敎育에 있어서의 韓國史
역사교육
1976 .12
-
『三國史記』의 전쟁 표현과 정당성 인식의 차이
역사와 담론
2018 .10
-
삼국사기 각국 본기의 원전을 찾기 위한 각고의 노력 : 전덕재, 『三國史記 본기의 원전과 편찬』 (주류성출판사, 2018)
역사와 세계
2018 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-910-002364510