메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
배항섭 (성균관대학교)
저널정보
역사비평사 역사비평 역사비평 2016년 겨울호(통권 제117호)
발행연도
2016.11
수록면
153 - 193 (43page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
There are several conditions for political systems to be adopted as a ruling principle. Firstly, a specific ideology is needed to justify the governing of the ruled; secondly, practical political action appropriate to this should be instituted. East Asia has never been an exception for the invention and maintenance of its political system in ruling its people. To help the ruled appeal to the relevant offices in cases that they believed justice had not been done and thereby causing personal disadvantages, the government established a system of general litigation. Furthermore, if this was considered as having failed to bring justice, direct appeal to the ruler was the final option.
The voice of the people in the direct appeals system is analogous to public opinion or the will of the people. Even though the ruling class found the process of these appeals troublesome, they could not shut their ears to it. Direct appeal has been prepared as the system to control the complaints of people, and on the other hand it has been the means by which the people affected on the political system. Political participation of people in this way has also been realized in early modern times in East Asia. By the 19th century, the system of direct appeals demanded the establishment of a new political order resulting in a crisis for the ruling class.

목차

머리말
1. 조선의 직소
2. 중국의 직소
3. 일본의 직소
맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (25)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-905-001946213