지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study analyzed clothing items contained in the following works by Japanese writers: Manners of the Joseon Dynasty, Aspects of the Joseon Dynasty, Diverse Records of the Joseon Dynasty, Essays about the Joseon Dynasty, and Collected Stories of the Joseon Dynasty. Everyday clothing was an element included among principal items to be investigated from the beginning stage when Imperialist Japan planned to identify various manners and customs of the Joseon Dynasty. This study intended to analyze the objectives and viewpoints with which these three Japanese writers made their records.
Imamura, an Imperialist policeman, Nisimura, an inspector of the police agency, and Matsuda in charge of exchanges between the Joseon Dynasty and Japan felt it urgent to understand the manners of the Joseon Dynasty for the smooth performance of their official duties in the Joseon Dynasty which they colonized. Their records selectively included clothing items of the Joseon Dynasty. Manners of the Joseon Dynasty made a systematic composition of Jeson’s clothing items while Aspects of the Joseon Dynasty showed a simple description of materialistic and formative properties of Joseon’s dress designs. Matsuda wrote his work in a style similar to essay-writing, lacking in accuracy compared with the other two authors. The three writers were different from each other in the language used. Imamura described in both Chinese letters and Katakana. Nisimura wrote names of dress designs in Korean, indexing them. Matsuda wrote the main body of his work in Korean.
Referring to description methods, they adopted three ways in their writing. First, they compared the clothing styles of the Joseon Dynasty with those of Japan. Next, they distinguished between the new ways of clothing style and the ones of the Joseon Dynasty. Finally, they intended to guide the people of the Joseon Dynasty by showing them which aspects of the Joseon clothing styles needed to be improved, and suggesting alternatives for them. These description methods, their viewpoints, and the objectives of their recording the manners of the Joseon Dynasty projected the roles of Imperialist Japan and the justification of them as the principal agent of modernizing the colonized Joseon Dynasty.
Imamura, an Imperialist policeman, Nisimura, an inspector of the police agency, and Matsuda in charge of exchanges between the Joseon Dynasty and Japan felt it urgent to understand the manners of the Joseon Dynasty for the smooth performance of their official duties in the Joseon Dynasty which they colonized. Their records selectively included clothing items of the Joseon Dynasty. Manners of the Joseon Dynasty made a systematic composition of Jeson’s clothing items while Aspects of the Joseon Dynasty showed a simple description of materialistic and formative properties of Joseon’s dress designs. Matsuda wrote his work in a style similar to essay-writing, lacking in accuracy compared with the other two authors. The three writers were different from each other in the language used. Imamura described in both Chinese letters and Katakana. Nisimura wrote names of dress designs in Korean, indexing them. Matsuda wrote the main body of his work in Korean.
Referring to description methods, they adopted three ways in their writing. First, they compared the clothing styles of the Joseon Dynasty with those of Japan. Next, they distinguished between the new ways of clothing style and the ones of the Joseon Dynasty. Finally, they intended to guide the people of the Joseon Dynasty by showing them which aspects of the Joseon clothing styles needed to be improved, and suggesting alternatives for them. These description methods, their viewpoints, and the objectives of their recording the manners of the Joseon Dynasty projected the roles of Imperialist Japan and the justification of them as the principal agent of modernizing the colonized Joseon Dynasty.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 저자의 도선과 풍속 관련 저작의 집필 목적
3. 의생활 항목의 체계와 내용
4. 의생활 항목의 복식 명칭 표기와 서술 방식
5. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
중국소설 《西遊記》 번역본의 조선후기 유통에 관한 연구 : 영남대 소장 번역필사본을 중심으로
중국어문논역총간
2017 .01
-
朝鮮 初期 中國語 通譯 發展 背景에 관한 硏究 －≪朝鮮王朝實錄≫의 記錄을 中心으로－
중국어문학
2015 .01
-
조선후기 刀劒 素材 科擧 答案사례에 대한 一考察 -｢劒策問｣과 ｢劒對策文｣을 중심으로-
동방한문학
2020 .01
-
谷口園 鄭象觀의 『史記』 애호와 그 의의 -｢讀馬史｣ 및 南漢朝와의 왕복 서한을 중심으로-
한국한문학연구
2024 .08
-
조선 전기 패설 연구의 성과와 방향
동방한문학
2019 .01
-
申翊聖의 金剛山 遊記를 통해 본朝鮮 後期 遊記의 文體的 多變化
한국한문학연구
2020 .01
-
<용비어천가>의 六祖 서술 양상 고찰
어문연구
2018 .01
-
조선전기 순창 단오성황제 재현을 위한 유교제의儒敎祭儀 참여자 복식 제안
국학연구
2022 .03
-
조선시대 외교현장의 『詩經』 활용 고찰
중국학
2015 .01
-
조선시대 풍속과 관련된 『詩經』 활용례 고찰 - 『朝鮮王朝實錄』을 중심으로
중국학
2016 .12
-
조선 초기 관료의 관청이동을 통해 본 주요 통치기구의 위상 — HAVNet 자료를 중심으로 —
사림
2021 .01
-
甁窩 李衡祥의 字學에 대한 연구— 抄錄 여부에 대한 고증을 중심으로 —
동양고전연구
2019 .01
-
조선 전기 불상 특징과 조선 후기 17세기로의 이행
한국중세고고학
2019 .12
-
1930년대 중후반 식민지 조선 금융기구 개편론의 전개와 함의
한국사연구
2020 .09
-
도선(道詵)의 예언서와 정경(鄭經), 그리고 정진인
일본문화학보
2019 .08
-
조선후기 경상도 주민의 일본 표착과 송환
해항도시문화교섭학
2022 .04
-
조선 후기 실학파의 삽화에 대한 인식 - 한·중 비교의 관점에서
중국어문학논집
2024 .06
-
일본근세 고증수필 속 조선관련 기사
日本學硏究
2018 .01
-
조선시대 대중국 역사변무의 의미
역사비평
2016 .08
-
Moving Beyond Politics: Western Scholarship on Joseon
Korea Journal
2021 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-380-002116527