지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 동국대학교 불교학술원 International Journal of Buddhist Thought and Culture International Journal of Buddhist Thought & Culture Vol.27 No.1
- 발행연도
- 2017.6
- 수록면
- 11 - 44 (34page)
- DOI
- 10.16893/IJBTC.27.01.01
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Recently, a stack of Sanskrit birch-bark manuscripts was discovered allegedly from a certain place within ancient Greater Gāndhāra. They are written in “Gilgit-Bamiyan type I” and date to between 679–770 CE with a 95.4 percent probability, based on a C14 test on the birch-bark. Amongst the hundreds of fragments, I have been able to identify around thirty folios of several Mahāyāna scriptures, namely the Tathāgataguṇajnānācintyaviṣayāvatāra and the Dvādaśadaṇḍakanāmāṣṭaśatavimalīkaraṇā as well as those of the Saṃghāṭasūtra and the Larger Prajnāpāramitā.
In order to display the importance of this discovery, I have decided to publish some preliminary results of my on-going study of this collection. In this paper, I deal with four folios of the Tathāgataguṇajnānācintyaviṣayāvatāra and Dvādaśadaṇḍakanāmāṣṭaśatavimalīkaraṇā.
Up to present no Sanskrit manuscript of the Tathāgataguṇajnānācintyaviṣayāvatāra has been known. By comparing these newly-discovered fragments with the Sanskrit texts of the Śraddhābalādhānāvatāramudrāsūtra, which is only quoted fragmentarily in the Śikṣāsamuccaya by Śāntideva and the Sarvabuddhaviṣayāvatārajnānālokālaṃkāra, a complete manuscript of which was found in 1999 at the Potala Palace in Lhasa, I found that they shared similar expressions and so I came to the conclusion that these manuscripts belonged to the same group of scriptures.
A Sanskrit manuscript of the Dvādaśadaṇḍakanāmāṣṭaśatavimalīkaraṇā amongst the “Gilgit manuscripts” was reproduced in a facsimile in Gilgit Buddhist Manuscripts (Facsimile Edition) and transcribed and edited by Dutt in Gilgit Manuscript vol. I, who mistakenly entitled this text as the Śrīmahādevīvyākaraṇa, apparently based on the Tibetan translation. In the light of these newly-discovered fragments of the scripture in question as well as the Tibetan and Chinese translations, the deficiency of Dutt’s edition of the Gilgit manuscript of this scripture is now evident.
In order to display the importance of this discovery, I have decided to publish some preliminary results of my on-going study of this collection. In this paper, I deal with four folios of the Tathāgataguṇajnānācintyaviṣayāvatāra and Dvādaśadaṇḍakanāmāṣṭaśatavimalīkaraṇā.
Up to present no Sanskrit manuscript of the Tathāgataguṇajnānācintyaviṣayāvatāra has been known. By comparing these newly-discovered fragments with the Sanskrit texts of the Śraddhābalādhānāvatāramudrāsūtra, which is only quoted fragmentarily in the Śikṣāsamuccaya by Śāntideva and the Sarvabuddhaviṣayāvatārajnānālokālaṃkāra, a complete manuscript of which was found in 1999 at the Potala Palace in Lhasa, I found that they shared similar expressions and so I came to the conclusion that these manuscripts belonged to the same group of scriptures.
A Sanskrit manuscript of the Dvādaśadaṇḍakanāmāṣṭaśatavimalīkaraṇā amongst the “Gilgit manuscripts” was reproduced in a facsimile in Gilgit Buddhist Manuscripts (Facsimile Edition) and transcribed and edited by Dutt in Gilgit Manuscript vol. I, who mistakenly entitled this text as the Śrīmahādevīvyākaraṇa, apparently based on the Tibetan translation. In the light of these newly-discovered fragments of the scripture in question as well as the Tibetan and Chinese translations, the deficiency of Dutt’s edition of the Gilgit manuscript of this scripture is now evident.
목차
Abstract
Prologue
Abbreviations
References
참고문헌 (2)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
King Prasenajit Bemoans the Death of His Grandmother : A Study of the Manuscript SHT 7185
International Journal of Buddhist Thought and Culture
2017 .06
-
인도어 사본 연구 현황과 과제: 국내학계를 중심으로
불교학연구
2019 .01
-
On the Early History of Indic Buddhist Colophons
International Journal of Buddhist Thought and Culture
2017 .06
-
Untying the Bonds of Hatred: Manuscripts of a Dhāraṇī from Dunhuang
International Journal of Buddhist Thought and Culture
2020 .12
-
의례 전통과 楚 나라 지역의 儒家 ‒의례화된 덕의 수양‒
철학
2022 .05
-
문학 번역과 번역사
T&I REVIEW
2015 .06
-
스코옌 컬렉션 산스끄리뜨어 대품반야경 필사본 MS2627/4 기초조사(I)
동아시아불교문화
2024 .08
-
東アジアの書籍文化 - 様式の比較から -
동서인문학
2019 .08
-
강원지역 고문서 조사⋅정리의 현황과 과제
태동고전연구
2019 .01
-
새 자료 번역필사본 『망남□』에 대하여
중국어문학논집
2019 .10
-
초기 우리말 성서의 저본 사용에 대한 통시적 연구 : 마태복음을 중심으로
한국기독교신학논총
2017 .10
-
Д.Равжаагийн “Цаасан шувуу” зохиолын нэгэн гар бичмэлд хийсэн баймж утгын задлал
알타이학보
2023 .06
-
조선 前期 조리서의 김치 명칭 借字 표기 연구 -土邑과 毛隱止 및 捫之沈菜 사례-
민족문화
2022 .07
-
『열하일기』 정본화 작업의 제문제-신자료 소개를 겸하여-
한국한문학연구
2018 .01
-
상박초간 {주역} 감괘(欽卦) 연구
한국철학논집
2018 .01
-
가장본 『맹자요의』 검토의 몇 가지 측면
다산학
2021 .12
-
<闡義昭鑑諺解> 목판본과 필사본 간의 문체론적 특징 고찰
동양고전연구
2018 .01
-
새로 확인된 『현관장엄론』 게송사본과 아리야 비묵띠세나의 『현관장엄론』 주석서 콜로폰
불교학연구
2015 .01
-
백서『역전』에 나타난 유가의 정치사상- 「황제사경」과의 비교를 통해 -
동양철학
2018 .07
-
Uṣṇīṣavijayā-dhāraṇī: The Complete Sanskrit Text Based on Nepalese Manuscripts
International Journal of Buddhist Thought and Culture
2020 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-022-000965989