지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2017.8
- 수록면
- 1 - 104 (104page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Opening of the Shinbundang metro rail on 30th of January 2016 causes large scale changes of transportation mode choices in the southern part of the Capital region, Especially, passenger demand of metro buses has decreased a great deal. Daily average number of metro bus passengers in October, 2015 was 37,463 in the Yongin-shi area and it decreased to 29,606 in March of 2016 (21.0% decrease). In case of Suwon-shi this number decreased from 26,054 to 22,635.
The most dramatic decrease of passenger demand was found in M5414 line, which was 80.5% cut. Also 8201 line, 6800 line, and 1570 line lost their passengers respectively by 54.0%, 45.0%, and 42.5%. According to this demand changes, 26 metro buses in 5 metro bus lines were decided to stop operating. Among them M5414 line was completely closed and 10 buses out of 21 buses of 8201 line were removed.
In order to find out the reasons for the passengers to change mode choice from their original mode to the Shinbundang metro rail, we conducted face to face interview survey for the Shinbundang metro rail users and metro bus users.
The most prominent reason of mode choice change is ‘travel time saving (63.4%)’ The Shinbundang metro rail users can save 20 minutes on average compare to their original transportation mode when the final destination is Kangnam station. Considering ‘dispatch reliability(16.3%)’ and ‘close to the station(3.1%)’ are also factors to decide the total travel time with travel speed, it is safe to say that 83.4% of passengers decided to use the Shinbundang metro rail because of ‘total travel time saving’.
70% of originally private car users answer that they decide to use the Shinbundang metro rail because this rail is faster than their cars. Thus, in the metro commuting trips, metro rails can have competitiveness over cars due to its long distance and high speed compared to general urban subways. This study finds that the average travel time saving of originally car users is 20.4 minutes. This means that if car uses can save 38% of original travel time then they will give up their cars.
Those who still use metro buses in spite of the opening of metro rail in their neighborhood answers their reasons as follows. First, bus station is close to home (24.4%), Second, metro buses are faster (21.4%). Third, final destination is close to the metro bus station (15.1%). These three factors actually represent ‘total travel time’. This means 61.9% of metro bus users choose buses because buses are faster than the metro rail to their destination. One particular factor showing in the reason of choosing metro bus is ‘I can have a seat.’ This shows that securing a seat during an hour or so travel in the long distance commuting is a very important factor of mode choice. In order to enhance competitiveness of metro buses and provide a differentiated service from metro rails, seat reservation system and high-end seated buses are recommended to be introduced.
The most dramatic decrease of passenger demand was found in M5414 line, which was 80.5% cut. Also 8201 line, 6800 line, and 1570 line lost their passengers respectively by 54.0%, 45.0%, and 42.5%. According to this demand changes, 26 metro buses in 5 metro bus lines were decided to stop operating. Among them M5414 line was completely closed and 10 buses out of 21 buses of 8201 line were removed.
In order to find out the reasons for the passengers to change mode choice from their original mode to the Shinbundang metro rail, we conducted face to face interview survey for the Shinbundang metro rail users and metro bus users.
The most prominent reason of mode choice change is ‘travel time saving (63.4%)’ The Shinbundang metro rail users can save 20 minutes on average compare to their original transportation mode when the final destination is Kangnam station. Considering ‘dispatch reliability(16.3%)’ and ‘close to the station(3.1%)’ are also factors to decide the total travel time with travel speed, it is safe to say that 83.4% of passengers decided to use the Shinbundang metro rail because of ‘total travel time saving’.
70% of originally private car users answer that they decide to use the Shinbundang metro rail because this rail is faster than their cars. Thus, in the metro commuting trips, metro rails can have competitiveness over cars due to its long distance and high speed compared to general urban subways. This study finds that the average travel time saving of originally car users is 20.4 minutes. This means that if car uses can save 38% of original travel time then they will give up their cars.
Those who still use metro buses in spite of the opening of metro rail in their neighborhood answers their reasons as follows. First, bus station is close to home (24.4%), Second, metro buses are faster (21.4%). Third, final destination is close to the metro bus station (15.1%). These three factors actually represent ‘total travel time’. This means 61.9% of metro bus users choose buses because buses are faster than the metro rail to their destination. One particular factor showing in the reason of choosing metro bus is ‘I can have a seat.’ This shows that securing a seat during an hour or so travel in the long distance commuting is a very important factor of mode choice. In order to enhance competitiveness of metro buses and provide a differentiated service from metro rails, seat reservation system and high-end seated buses are recommended to be introduced.
목차
[표지]
[연구요약]
[차례]
표차례
그림차례
[제1장 서론]
제1절 연구의 배경 및 목적
제2절 연구의 방법 및 흐름
[제2장 신분당선 정자~광교구간 개통효과]
제1절 기존 광역전철 및 전철 개통효과
제2절 광역버스 수요변화
제3절 광역버스 및 지선버스 노선 조정
[제3장 이용자 선호도 조사 및 이용행태 분석]
제1절 신분당선 이용자 특성 분석
제2절 광역버스 이용자 특성 분석
[제4장 결론 및 정책제언]
제1절 신분당선 결론 및 정책제언
제2절 광역버스 결론 및 정책제언
[참고문헌]
[Abstract]
[부록]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
경기도 주요 버스정책 평가 및 발전방안 : 광역버스 및 맞춤형버스를 중심으로
정책연구
2018 .12
-
경기도 대중교통 소외지역 버스 서비스 개선방안
정책연구
2022 .10
-
경기도 전기버스 표준모델 수립 및 적용방안
정책연구
2022 .12
-
수도권 전기버스 도입 확대 방안 연구
정책연구
2018 .11
-
시내버스 무정차 운행 실태 및 관리방안
정책연구
2021 .07
-
경기심야버스 운행체계 효율화 방안
정책연구
2019 .08
-
경기도 심야버스 운행체계 개선방안 연구
정책연구
2015 .11
-
Are Critical Success Factors of BI Systems Really Unique?
Journal of Information Technology Applications & Management
2017 .03
-
정보시스템 운영성과 관리시스템 구축에 관한 사례연구
Journal of Information Technology Applications & Management
2017 .03
-
비접촉식 버스요금 결제 시스템 도입 및 확대방안
정책연구
2021 .09
-
코로나19 영향으로 인한 버스이용패턴 분석연구
경기연구원 기본연구
2021 .07
-
경기도 버스 차내정보의 연계 및 활용방안 연구
정책연구
2019 .07
-
Seoul Metro: Leading the Way in Smart, Inclusive Public Transport
Recent Trends of Law & Regulation in Korea
2025 .03
-
TO BUCKLE UP OR NOT BUCKLE UP, THAT IS THE QUESTION: AN EXAMINATION OF THE ETHICAL DECISION MAKING PROCESS PERTAINING TO SCHOOL BUS RESTRAINT IN THE UNITED STATES
국제법무
2015 .11
-
시외직행 공항버스 서비스 개선방안
정책연구
2020 .11
-
휠체어 탑승 가능 고속/시외버스 정책, 어떻게 설계되어야 하는가?: 버스 운전자 및 버스 이용객 인터뷰를 중심으로
유통경영학회지
2019 .08
-
‘서울시 시내버스 요금·정산체계’ 시민 인식 조사와 시사점
서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서
2020 .08
-
버스준공영제 시행에 따른 대도시 시내버스 노선의 효율성 분석 : 광주광역시 사례를 중심으로
한국지역개발학회지
2016 .12
-
광주시 학생통행실태 분석과 대중교통 이용 활성화 방안
정책연구
2021 .11
-
머신러닝 기반의 경기도 광역버스 이용변화 예측 연구
경기연구원 기본연구
2021 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
지하철 신분당선 개발사업이 주변 아파트 가격에 미치는 영향 분석 : 용인시 수지구를 중심으로
배진희
,
최근희
도시행정학보
2018
.12
서울 지하철서비스의 공급비용과 적정 요금수준 추정
金成洙
,
朴晉瓊
환경논총
2003
.12
수도권 신도시 내 도시철도 개통에 따른 주택가격 변화 - 광교신도시 사례 -
최필성
,
현동우
부동산분석
2022
.04
「대중교통중심 광역 간선도로망 구축방안 연구」
최성택
,
박준식
,
윤상원
대한교통학회 학술대회지
2021
.11
도보거리를 활용한 신도시 내 광역버스 정류장과의 접근성이 주택가격에 미치는 영향 - 동탄2신도시 사례 -
최필성
,
현동우
부동산분석
2021
.11
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-309-001266907