지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2019.9
- 수록면
- 79 - 114 (36page)
- DOI
- 10.29323/mchina.2019.9.83.79
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article investigates the rise of cosmopolitanism during the era of May Fourth Movement in China, under the perspective that intellectual trends and features of the movement were closely connected for explicating the historical trend of the contemporary intellectual thinking of China. The article attempts to take a fresh look at the practice on the May Fourth from the context of intellectual history, about how the basically transnational thinking of cosmopolitanism competed with the nationalism which was particularly influential under the semi-colonial circumstance of China, and about how it worked as a recognizing momentum for remodeling the contents of Chinese nationalism.
It carries out a two-fold analysis for further concrete investigation: first, defining the characteristic of Chinese cosmopolitanism so called post-war discourse it analyzes a diversified intellectual context during the formation of the discourse. Second, evaluating the significance and limitation of cosmopolitanism in building the relationship between (the remodeling of) China, (the remodeling of) the World, and Asia.
There are three major points that is emphasized in the article: first of all, cosmopolitan thinking during the May Fourth era of China played a critical role as a universal discourse like de facto zeitgeist, so much so that it continuously competed with nationalism and that it consequently supplied a momentum for rethinking nationalism. Second, the rise of cosmopolitanism before and after the May Fourth era was a reflection of the intellectual agenda of post-war discourse, a transition in history of civilization. Third, strongly reflected in the Chinese prospect of cosmopolitanism were the critical view against the western-dominant modern world and the willingness to participate in the post-war world order in a more leading manner. Fourth, the principle of self-determination which drove the May Fourth Movement was rather perceived as realizing public good of the world than as a self-expansion of nationalism of one nation-state, and it necessitated the core process of remodeling China based on the practice of democracy. Fifth, although it was paramount for evidencing the vision of cosmopolitanism, the perception of Asia was significantly lacking in Chinese understanding of cosmopolitanism.
It carries out a two-fold analysis for further concrete investigation: first, defining the characteristic of Chinese cosmopolitanism so called post-war discourse it analyzes a diversified intellectual context during the formation of the discourse. Second, evaluating the significance and limitation of cosmopolitanism in building the relationship between (the remodeling of) China, (the remodeling of) the World, and Asia.
There are three major points that is emphasized in the article: first of all, cosmopolitan thinking during the May Fourth era of China played a critical role as a universal discourse like de facto zeitgeist, so much so that it continuously competed with nationalism and that it consequently supplied a momentum for rethinking nationalism. Second, the rise of cosmopolitanism before and after the May Fourth era was a reflection of the intellectual agenda of post-war discourse, a transition in history of civilization. Third, strongly reflected in the Chinese prospect of cosmopolitanism were the critical view against the western-dominant modern world and the willingness to participate in the post-war world order in a more leading manner. Fourth, the principle of self-determination which drove the May Fourth Movement was rather perceived as realizing public good of the world than as a self-expansion of nationalism of one nation-state, and it necessitated the core process of remodeling China based on the practice of democracy. Fifth, although it was paramount for evidencing the vision of cosmopolitanism, the perception of Asia was significantly lacking in Chinese understanding of cosmopolitanism.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 5 · 4운동 전후 세계주의 사유의 활성화: ‘戰後담론’으로서의 세계주의
Ⅲ. ‘중국’과 ‘세계’ 그리고 ‘아시아’: 세계주의의 가능성과 한계
Ⅳ. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (1)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Rethinking Nationalism, Patriotism, and Cosmopolitanism: A Confucian Perspective
Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture
2019 .08
-
[On This Topic] Varieties of Cosmopolitanism
Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture
2025 .02
-
Confucius as a Cosmopolitan: Thought and Practice
Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture
2024 .08
-
[On This Topic] Comparative Perspectives on the Future of Cosmopolitanism
Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture
2024 .08
-
Human Rights, Pandemic, and Cosmopolitanism: A Christian Cosmopolitanism for the Post-Pandemic Anthropocene
Madang: Journal of Contextual Theology
2021 .06
-
Tianxia: Between Cosmopolitanism and Nationalism
Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture
2025 .02
-
Reconciling Cosmopolitanism with the Ethics of Personal Relationships: Solutions from Historical Confucian Philosophy
Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture
2025 .02
-
세계시민주의의 창으로 재평가한 홍일식의 문화영토론
동서철학연구
2024 .03
-
세계화 시대의 세계시민주의와 종교
종교연구
2022 .04
-
The Cost of Divided Loyalties: Family, Country, and the World as Independent Values
Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture
2025 .02
-
Rereading Frank O’Hara’s “I Do This, I Do That” Poems: Consumption and Modern Urban Life
현대영미시연구
2017 .01
-
To be a Citizen in the World of Language: Cosmopolitanism in South Korea
Korea Journal
2020 .12
-
기독교 세계시민주의 : 초기 기독교 정치윤리
신학과세계
2017 .12
-
Virginia Woolf's modernist narratives and cosmopolitanism focused on Three Guineas and Mrs. Dalloway
영미어문학
2022 .06
-
세계시민주의, 민족주의, 언어- 헤르더(J. G. Herder)와 피히테(J. G. Fichte)
철학∙사상∙문화
2015 .07
-
루만 체계이론의 세계시민주의 담론으로서의 가능성
인문사회과학연구
2016 .01
-
칸트와 멜빌의 코스모폴리타니즘 비교 연구
동서비교문학저널
2023 .09
-
What Kind of Nation-State Do They Want to Build: Chinese Intellectuals and Nationalism in Contemporary China
중국지식네트워크
2023 .05
-
한나 아렌트와 세계시민주의 재고: ‘권리를 가질 권리’ 개념을 중심으로
현대유럽철학연구
2024 .01
-
세계시민주의에 대한 헤겔의 입장과 타자성 ― 칸트의 세계시민주의와의 연관성을 중심으로 ―
헤겔연구
2016 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-912-001237505