메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
양지혜 (한국교원대학교)
저널정보
한국역사연구회 역사와현실 역사와 현실 제117호
발행연도
2020.9
수록면
333 - 362 (30page)
DOI
10.35865/YWH.2020.09.117.333

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In Korea, modern infrastructure establishment began in many areas during the Japanese Colonial period. Especially the ports and harbors along the Eastern coastline were built by the Japanese imperial government, army and companies, so that troops could be transported to China and trade goods be exchanged with Japan. Examination of how they were developed would help us realize the so-called ‘colonized modernity’ embedded in the harbors’ and ports’ construction process, and figure out what kind of legacies from that period was left behind while others are still with us.
Hamheung city is a unique case amongst all the harbors established on the Eastern coastline of the Korean peninsula in this time period, as the port in this city was not only constructed for the purpose of transportation (of products to support Japanese war efforts) but also designed to serve as a base port for a Japanese major corporation named Nitchitsu(Japanese Nitrogen Fertilizers). Such important nature of the Hamheung port was rather neglected in previous studies, as they (studies of East Coast harbors) concentrated upon the so-called ‘Northern line route’ in the 1930s.
Examined in this article are all the parties involved in the decision-making process concerning the Hamheung harbor development: the Joseon Governor General Office, the aforementioned Nitchitsu, which was the main investor in facility production, and Local elites who controlled the press and utilized community gatherings to shape the local opinion. These three elements seemed to have sometimes combined forces and sometimes did not, yet they ultimately worked together in shaping the details of the Hamheung harbor. Meanwhile, contrary to the initial prospect that harbor development would bring only prosperity to the area in general, different interest groups aspiring for their own profits and merits ended up colliding with each other in a chaotic fashion. In the end, the Hamheung harbor project, which was driven by the local community’s thirst for development, resulted in creating a harbor that exclusively benefitted a private sector corporation.
After the liberation, the Hamheung harbor entered a stage of decline, due to the state policy of reinforcing trades between North Korea, China and Russia. For a harbor which was built not upon local needs above all else but to fulfill needs of the Japanese imperial government and its corporations, its deterioration may have been an inevitable outcome. The history of the Hamheung harbor in the last century, which was nothing but a poster product of the so-called ‘colonized modernization,’ leads us to think that in a globalized world of logistics, the ‘continuation of life’ rather than ‘circulation of goods’ should be the new focus in our pursuit of prosperity in the future.

목차

머리말
1. 1880년 개항 이후 원산의 부상과 함흥의 쇠락
2. 1920년대 일본질소의 진출과 조선총독부의 함흥 축항 계획 발표
3. 1930년대 함흥의 분할과 함중선 부설운동의 전개
4. 전시하 함중선 기획의 좌초와 함흥의 외항 상실
맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (19)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0