메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
권태원 (한양대학교) 이효신 (한양대학교) 조혜수 (한양대학교)
저널정보
한국체육과학회 한국체육과학회지 한국체육과학회지 제30권 제1호 (자연과학 편)
발행연도
2021.2
수록면
1,001 - 1,011 (11page)
DOI
10.35159/kjss.2021.2.30.1.1001

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The technological revolution in the 21st century has promoted the development of science and technology, and people"s lives have undergone tremendous changes. However, new developments have allowed many modern people to maintain a low metabolic level for a long time, leading to an imbalance in energy intake and energy consumption, leading to obesity. In particular, existing studies have shown that obesity is closely related to the occurrence and death of chronic diseases. In order to prevent chronic diseases in the early stage, simple, inexpensive and accurate obesity evaluation methods are particularly important in daily life. The purpose of this study is to use the BFP obesity evaluation standard as the “Gold Standard” to find out the consistency of the BMI, WC and WHtR obesity evaluation methods on the obesity determination results of college students. A total of 114 college students were recruited for this study, including 65 males and 49 females. The results of the study are as follows. First, There was no significant difference in the obesity detection rate between men and women in the four obesity evaluation indicators. Second, the results of correlation analysis show that there is a certain degree of correlation among the four obesity evaluation indicators BFP, WC, BMI and WHtR. Third, from the perspective of Kappa coefficient, WHtR obesity evaluation method has higher consistency than BMI and WC. Therefore, combining these results, it can be judged that compared with BMI and WC, the WHtR obesity evaluation method is closer to the BFP obesity evaluation standard when judging the obesity of college students, that is, the consistency is stronger.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 연구방법
Ⅲ. 결과
Ⅳ. 논의
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (26)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2021-692-001567768