메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
오세숙 (경기대학교)
저널정보
한국여가레크리에이션학회 한국여가레크리에이션학회지 한국여가레크리에이션학회지 제49권 제1호&특별호 (통권 제106호)
발행연도
2025.3
수록면
15 - 26 (12page)
DOI
10.26446/kjlrp.2025.3.49.1.15

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
There are limited studies that measured activity levels using an accelerometer targeting Korean elderly people, so studies that measured and compared activity levels by type of physical leisure activity would be meaningful. This study compared the differences in activity levels by classifying the elderly aged 60 or older into three groups (walking group; AG, non-walking group; BG, and control group; CG) according to the type of physical leisure activity. The following conclusions were obtained by analyzing the effects of leisure activity types on body composition, lipid metabolism, and muscle strength. First, the body mass index and waist circumference of both groups participating in physical leisure activities were significantly lower than those of the CG. Second, the total activity per body weight, physical activity per body weight, number of steps, and activity time at moderate intensity were all significantly higher than those of the CG in both groups participating in physical leisure activities. Third, in muscle strength measurement, the left-hand grip strength of the BG and the CG was significantly higher than that of the AG. The right-hand grip strength of the BG was significantly higher than that of the AG. Fourth, in both groups participating in physical leisure activities, body fat mass was significantly lower than the CG, but only the BG had a significantly lower body fat percentage than the CG. Skeletal muscle mass was also significantly higher in both groups participating in physical leisure activities, but only the BG had a significantly higher skeletal muscle percentage than the CG.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 연구방법
Ⅲ. 결과
Ⅳ. 논의
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-25-02-092542338