지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 1994.12
- 수록면
- 195 - 212 (18page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study aims at understanding patterns of changes in the relationship between the state and religions and at pursuing policies to establish a desirable relationship between them in a diversified society by analyzing trends in the religious policies of the governments of the six Republics (1st therough 6th). These goals will be achieved through an examination of publications of the Administration and formal publications of religious denominations and, on occasion, through interviews with public servants concerned and clergymen.
From a historical points of view, the relationship between politics and religions is characterized as of the following three types. The first type is characterized by an inseparable tie between politics and religion, the second by one utilizing or dominating the other, and the third by there being some tension between the two. In view of these types, modem countries can be classified according to their religious policies into, (a) those countries which separate politics and religion (such as the United States. France, Japan, and Italy since 1984), (b) those countries which take a particular religion as the state religion (such as the United Kingdom, Spain, Thai, and Arab countries), and (c) those countries which recognize no religions whatsoever (most of communist countries).
The relationship between politics and religion in Korea had wavered for a long time until it got stated explicitly in the Constitution promulgated on July 17, 1948. Article 12 of the Constitution goes: "All citizens have the freedom of religion and of conscience. There is no such thing as the religion of the state: Religion is separated from politics. " The details of the separation stated in the Constitution are: (a) denial of the existence of the state religion, (b) ban on patronizing or discriminating against (a) particular religion(s), (c) ban on religious education by the state, (d) restriction on intervention in politics by religious bodies, and (e) recognition of religious bodies' autonomy.
It is true that the governmental policies on religion so far have been identified with short-sighted and improvisational guidelines as a result of the failure to recognize the multi-religious situation, a phenomenon peculiar to the Korean society. The government has maintained different relationships with different religions depending on pol i tical situation, it has supported those particular religious bodies which have been supportive of governmental policies while staying away from or banning those which have been critical or unsupportive. Thus, this kind of nonuniform religious policies brought about the situation where the government built special relationships with individual religions. This course of actions taken by the government not only are against the constitutional principle of the separation between politics and religion, but also resulted in the nonexistence of religious policies.
From a historical points of view, the relationship between politics and religions is characterized as of the following three types. The first type is characterized by an inseparable tie between politics and religion, the second by one utilizing or dominating the other, and the third by there being some tension between the two. In view of these types, modem countries can be classified according to their religious policies into, (a) those countries which separate politics and religion (such as the United States. France, Japan, and Italy since 1984), (b) those countries which take a particular religion as the state religion (such as the United Kingdom, Spain, Thai, and Arab countries), and (c) those countries which recognize no religions whatsoever (most of communist countries).
The relationship between politics and religion in Korea had wavered for a long time until it got stated explicitly in the Constitution promulgated on July 17, 1948. Article 12 of the Constitution goes: "All citizens have the freedom of religion and of conscience. There is no such thing as the religion of the state: Religion is separated from politics. " The details of the separation stated in the Constitution are: (a) denial of the existence of the state religion, (b) ban on patronizing or discriminating against (a) particular religion(s), (c) ban on religious education by the state, (d) restriction on intervention in politics by religious bodies, and (e) recognition of religious bodies' autonomy.
It is true that the governmental policies on religion so far have been identified with short-sighted and improvisational guidelines as a result of the failure to recognize the multi-religious situation, a phenomenon peculiar to the Korean society. The government has maintained different relationships with different religions depending on pol i tical situation, it has supported those particular religious bodies which have been supportive of governmental policies while staying away from or banning those which have been critical or unsupportive. Thus, this kind of nonuniform religious policies brought about the situation where the government built special relationships with individual religions. This course of actions taken by the government not only are against the constitutional principle of the separation between politics and religion, but also resulted in the nonexistence of religious policies.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 한국에 있어서 국가-종교 관계의 역사적 전개
Ⅲ. 한국종교계의 현황분석
Ⅳ. 한국에서의 국가-종교 관계 변화 추이
Ⅴ. 결어 : 종교정책의 발전방향
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
한국ㆍ대만ㆍ일본의 종교 관련 인식 비교 연구
국제지역학논총
2010 .12
-
인도네시아 헌법과 종교
외법논집
2012 .01
-
다원주의적 정교분리 모델의 필요성에 대한 연구
미국헌법연구
2018 .12
-
종교인의 정치참여와 정교분리의 원칙
고려법학
2019 .01
-
How and Why should We Study Religions in the Age of Globalisation?
종교와 문화
2020 .01
-
Religion and economy: An empirical study
Journal of Economic Research (JER)
2020 .01
-
우리나라 종교문화정책의 문제점과 위험성
문화정책논총
2019 .04
-
현대적 종교현상으로서 ‘유동적 종교’(Fluid Religion)에 대한 논의
한국사회학회 사회학대회 논문집
2015 .12
-
Why do Central Asian governments fear religion? A consideration of Christian movements
Journal of Eurasian Studies
2010 .01
-
종교, 격정, 공화국 - 존 애덤스(John Adams)의 시민종교론 고찰
국제정치연구
2015 .06
-
The Impact of Religious Freedom on Economic Growth
국제학논총
2012 .10
-
고교평준화제도에서 종립사학 종교교육의 범위: 대법원 2010. 4. 22. 선고 2008다38288 판결로부터의 시사점을 중심으로
교육법학연구
2020 .01
-
사립학교의 종교교육의 자유 : 대법원 2010.4.22. 선고, 2008다38288 전원합의체 판결
한양법학
2010 .08
-
정교분리 이후의 종교와 정치: 의미와 동학
민주사회와 정책연구
2014 .01
-
한국인의 종교성과 종교적 배타성 : 대인관계와 정치 후보자 지지를 중심으로
아세아연구
2013 .06
-
宗敎란 무엇인가? : 하나의 사회학적 정의
社會科學硏究
1988 .12
-
중국 중앙과 지방의 종교정책시스템 고찰 : 국무원령과 성 · 시 · 자치구「종교사무조례」의 상호관계성을 중심으로
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2020 .10
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-350-016529515