지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The faculty division of National history, Asian history, and Western history, which is common in the history departments of Korean universities, is based upon the dual centrism of Europe and the modern. In contrast, secondary history education has been ruptured because the 2007 national standards for history created a new subject, East Asian history. Currently, secondary history education has been reorganized into national history and world history.
Whereas the categorization of National, Asian, and Western historiesfollows regional divisions, the categorization of Korean, East Asian, and Western history pursues a concentric extension, not an enumeration. On the one hand, East Asian history overlaps with Korean history. On the other hand, it is a part of World history. First, the location and identity of East Asian history is in question. East Asian history is located in an interactive zone of the internal and the external, as well as of the global and the local. This interactive East Asian history can open up glocal history which reflects on history globally and makes history locally.
Ironically, the threefold system of history departments in Korea is based upon an internalization of three different centrisms: the nationalism of Korean history, the Sinocentrism of Eastern history, and the Eurocentrism of Western history. East Asian history pursuing glocal history can play the role of a compass for Korea in the twenty-first century by opening up a historical view for overcoming this threefold centrism. Departing from the idea that East Asian history could work like a diastrophism shaking up the faculty system of National, Eastern, and Western history in Korea, this paper addresses suggestions about East Asian history as a methodology for reconstructing history in Korea.
Whereas the categorization of National, Asian, and Western historiesfollows regional divisions, the categorization of Korean, East Asian, and Western history pursues a concentric extension, not an enumeration. On the one hand, East Asian history overlaps with Korean history. On the other hand, it is a part of World history. First, the location and identity of East Asian history is in question. East Asian history is located in an interactive zone of the internal and the external, as well as of the global and the local. This interactive East Asian history can open up glocal history which reflects on history globally and makes history locally.
Ironically, the threefold system of history departments in Korea is based upon an internalization of three different centrisms: the nationalism of Korean history, the Sinocentrism of Eastern history, and the Eurocentrism of Western history. East Asian history pursuing glocal history can play the role of a compass for Korea in the twenty-first century by opening up a historical view for overcoming this threefold centrism. Departing from the idea that East Asian history could work like a diastrophism shaking up the faculty system of National, Eastern, and Western history in Korea, this paper addresses suggestions about East Asian history as a methodology for reconstructing history in Korea.
목차
Ⅰ. 역사가로서 필자의 정체성
Ⅱ. 역사지식의 고고학
Ⅲ. 재구성을 위한 방법으로서 동아시아사
Ⅳ. 한국 역사학의 ‘문명사적 전환’
참고문헌
[ABSTRACT]
참고문헌 (25)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-910-003260980