지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 대한외과학회 Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research Vol.89 No.1
- 발행연도
- 2015.6
- 수록면
- 23 - 29 (7page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Purpose: The assurance of a negative resection margin is significant in rectal cancer as it indicates a reduced risk of local recurrence; thus, sufficient length of the resection margin is strongly required. The purpose of this study was to analyze the relationship between the length of the distal resection margin (DRM) and local recurrence or survival rate and to evaluate the possibility of performing sphincter-conserving surgery.
Methods: The medical records of 218 rectal cancer patients were analyzed. Patients were classified into three groups according to the length of the DRM as follows: group 1, DRM < 1 cm; group 2, 1 cm ≤ DRM ≤ 2 cm; and group 3, DRM > 2 cm.
Results: Of 218 patients enrolled, 81 were in group 1, 66 in group 2, and 71 in group 3. The 5-year survival rates were 78.2%, 78.2%, and 76.8% for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively, and there were no statistically significant differences in survival (P = 0.913). Local recurrence was found in 2 patients in group 1, 1 patient in group 2, and 1 patient in group 3; there were no statistically significant differences in local recurrence (P = 0.908).
Conclusion: A DRM of < 1 cm did not impair the oncologic outcomes of rectal cancer patients. Our results indicated that surgeons should keep in mind to consider the option of sphincter-conserving surgery with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy even in very low rectal cancer.
Methods: The medical records of 218 rectal cancer patients were analyzed. Patients were classified into three groups according to the length of the DRM as follows: group 1, DRM < 1 cm; group 2, 1 cm ≤ DRM ≤ 2 cm; and group 3, DRM > 2 cm.
Results: Of 218 patients enrolled, 81 were in group 1, 66 in group 2, and 71 in group 3. The 5-year survival rates were 78.2%, 78.2%, and 76.8% for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively, and there were no statistically significant differences in survival (P = 0.913). Local recurrence was found in 2 patients in group 1, 1 patient in group 2, and 1 patient in group 3; there were no statistically significant differences in local recurrence (P = 0.908).
Conclusion: A DRM of < 1 cm did not impair the oncologic outcomes of rectal cancer patients. Our results indicated that surgeons should keep in mind to consider the option of sphincter-conserving surgery with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy even in very low rectal cancer.
목차
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Local Recurrence after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy And Rectal Excision in Rectal Cancer Patients When The Distal Resection Margin Is Compromised
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2020 .11
-
Treatment of recurrence after local excision of rectal cancer
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2019 .10
-
Efficacy of preoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with cT2N0 distal rectal cancer
Annals of Coloproctology
2023 .06
-
Oncologic Outcomes of Postoperative Chemoradiotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone in Stage II and III Upper Rectal Cancer
Annals of Coloproctology
2019 .01
-
Omission of neoadjuvant radiotherapy for clinical T2/N1 and T3N0/1 middle and low rectal cancers with safe circumferential resection margins
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2022 .05
-
The Safety Distal Margin in Rectosigmoid Colon Cancer and Upper Rectal Cancer and its Impact on Recurrence
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2023 .05
-
Association between Metformin Use and Survival in Nonmetastatic Rectal Cancer Treated with a Curative Resection: A Nationwide Population Study
Cancer Research and Treatment
2017 .01
-
Preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by local excision in clinical T2N0 rectal cancer
Radiation oncology journal : ROJ
2016 .01
-
Prognostic Factors and Treatment of Recurrence after Local Excision of Rectal Cancer
Yonsei Medical Journal
2021 .12
-
Short- and long-term outcomes of local excision with adjuvant radiotherapy in high-risk T1 rectal cancer patients
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2022 .01
-
Matched case-control analysis comparing oncologic outcomes between preoperative and postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2017 .04
-
Optimal Complete Rectum Mobilization Focused on the Anatomy of the Pelvic Fascia and Autonomic Nerves: 30 Years of Experience at Severance Hospital
Yonsei Medical Journal
2021 .01
-
Is Late Recurrence need to be More Alert in Rectal Cancer Patients treated with Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy?
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2019 .10
-
Association between obesity and local control of advanced rectal cancer after combined surgery and radiotherapy
Radiation oncology journal : ROJ
2016 .01
-
Short- and mid-term outcomes of transanal versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancer: a meta-analysis
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2021 .02
-
Impact of circumferential tumor location of mid to low rectal cancer on oncologic outcomes after preoperative chemoradiotherapy
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2022 .08
-
Robotic Rectal Cancer Surgery
대한임상종양학회 학술대회지
2016 .02
-
Benefits of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Clinical T3-4N0 Rectal Cancer After Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy
전남의대학술지
2023 .01
-
Experience of sexual life in men with rectal cancer
성인간호학회 학술대회
2016 .06
-
Impact of Time Interval Between Chemoradiation and Surgery on Pathological Complete Response and Survival in Rectal Cancer
Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP
2016 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0