메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
박현경 (고려대학교) 박정희 (고려대학교) 김보경 (고려대학교)
저널정보
한국사회체육학회 한국사회체육학회지 한국사회체육학회지 제60호
발행연도
2015.5
수록면
675 - 684 (10page)
DOI
10.51979/KSSLS.2015.05.60.675

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this study was to analysis a differences of the health-related physical fitness by obesity and aging in the adult male. The subjects consisted of 4569 males referred to the Health Promotion Center at S district. All subjects were aged 20 to 69 years and divided into 5 groups; 20s(n=243), 30s(n=1243), 40s(n=1757), 50s(n=1043) and 60s(n=283). All participants were assessed strength(Grip strength), endurance strength(Push-up, Sit-up), flexibility(Sit-and-reach), Agility(Sidestep) and Sargent(Sargent jump). The data were analysed by independent t-test to investigate statistical differences in physical fitness by obesity and aging. The results were obtained as follows: 1. Push-up were significantly high through 20s to 40s in normal group compare to obesity group. In normal group, 20s(2.978 ,p<.05), 30s(6.030, p<.01) and 40s(5.681, p<.001) were higher than obesity. but 50s and 60s were not significant differences. 2. Sit up were not significant difference in all aged group 3. Grip strength were significantly high 20s(-4.901, p<.01), 30s(-5.017, p<.01), 40s(-4.375, p<.01) and 50s(-4.473, p<.01) in obesity group compare to normal group but were not significant difference in 60s. 4. Sit-and-reach were not significant difference in all of aged group except 30s(3.903, p<.01). 5. Sargent jump were significantly high by 3.207(p<.05) in 20s and 1.122(p<.01) in 30s in normal group but 30s, 40s and 50s were not significant difference. 6. Sidestep were showed high tendency in normal group compare to obesity group in 20s, 30s, 40s and 60s but were not showed significant difference in all aged.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 연구방법
Ⅲ. 결과
Ⅳ. 논의 및 결론
참고문헌
ABSTRACT

참고문헌 (33)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-692-001752553