메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
중앙대학교 법학연구원 法學論文集 法學論文集 제41권 제3호
발행연도
2017.1
수록면
331 - 360 (30page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
On Dec 18, 2013, the Korean Supreme Court has set out detailed standards on the previously contested ordinary wage. However after the Supreme Court En banc decision, still there exist arguments about ordinary wage. For example, There are lots of controversies between companies and employee about the ‘Welfare point’ that gave as the part of selective welfare system in public enterprise and public institutions to be included in ordinary wage or not, and as judgements of lower instance and higher instance got differed to cause confusion in the labor market. The fact of approving ‘Welfare point’ as the ordinary wage is the biggest issue about these days controversy related to ordinary wage. In this research, it analyzed ordinary wage related to welfare point in categories and make an assessments about such judicial judgements. To judge about the welfare point’s property as the ordinary wage, it is necessary to interpret the definition of wage according to the Labor standards and regulations about wage strictly and also need to interpret the wage property and ordinary wage property about the aspect of business welfare system rationally. It seems to be the appropriate way of interpreting about ordinary wage system and selective welfare system. This study hope to have rational judging principals through the judgement of the supreme court.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (32)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0